dxf file exchange format works well for between High Design and AutoCad releases 12,14 & 2000. dxf file formats currently,but this may change. High Design only supports import/export AutoCad. MacDraft has support for both native AutoCad. Transparency can be adjusted for all instances. There is sheet,layer and object/text,color transparency. These multi-sheets reside within the same drawing file much like a word processing file. In addition to layers,High Design has support for multi-sheet drawing documents. High Design's working environment feels friendlier,more inviting. Every commonly needed function should be easy to find and tightly integrated into the interface without inducing pallete clutter) An specific drawing app, such as CAD,even with image editing features, it should not contain a lot operating pallettes. (I use pallette heavy apps like Corel Painter and Adobe Photoshop everyday,but I get tired of navigating,adjusting and moving around palettes constantly in order to work on a drawing. I felt that MacDraft,while not pallete intensive,either, just relied too much on a pallette driven layout and I can forsee future versions only getting worse. Many features of its Application interface are built into the drawing window environment,very similar to AutoCad, and is much simpler and elegant feeling with minimal pallettes. This is an app that was designed from the ground up to be an easy to use OS X native application and drawing program and the company's efforts show everywhere High Design pricing is a little more expensive than MacDraft, but the program offers so much more in return for the slighly higher price. High Design is a relative new-comer at version 1.1.1īut after all the direct comparisons, I found that ilexsoft High Design offered more of everything that MacDraft had. MacDraft has been with the Mac community for awhile (up tp version 5.5) dxf file formats.īoth have powerful & flexible drawing,editing and text tools. Price points were similar for both appsīoth have easy User-intuitive interface designs for approaching the goal of creating great-looking drawings,easily.īoth have support for transparency,support for bit-mapped images,support for layers and of importance,support for AutoCad. I will comment on both CAD apps and explain my decision and choice.īoth apps are by far the most rich,and feature laden for their costs which come in at different price points for differnt user versions. After days of looking at both the MicroSpot web site and ilexsoft's site,I,ultimately, chose High Design for Mac. It had been a tough choice betweem MicroSpot's MacDraft (iLexsoft's High Design (for Mac. This is a commentary for those already using MacDraft ,for those that are still "on the fence" on deciding which CAD app for Mac to use, and for those still looking for a CAD app for Mac that is both affordable,powerful,but easy to use. High Design VS MacDraft-The Comparison and the Conflict,Oh My! Partnering this with microspot's other softwares 'Interiors Pro' & 'DWG Viewer' is something else i'd strongly recommend.Īll this at a very decent price is why id recommend it to anybody of any skill level looking for a very good 2D CAD Drafting product. The added library feature is also an excellent as it allows me to store stock designs such as windows, doors and stairs in a window within the program that I can drag and drop in to or out of at any time, meaning I never have to go through the monotony of redrawing parts for different designs.Īlso the option to export to DWG/DXF/PDF has saved me a lot of bother within my area of work. I use it for architectural drafting and general illustration and I find that the dimension tools, layers palette and bezier tool make my job so much easier. Where it performs brilliantly is within its main selling point, 2D design. Im currently using version 6.0.5 and I must say I'm always very impressed with the power and ease-of-use that MacDraft offers. Ive been using MacDraft Pro for a long time now and thought it was only right to credit it with a review.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |